Phoebe:
Interesting topic! If, however,
“‘Attacks’ can include:
— toward the ILO and other intergovernmental organisations for not meeting market demands”
does this also include the ‘attacks’ on the ILO by Guy Standing or myself (an attack of an admittedly different colour) for being the Mecca of Social Liberalism, worshiping bi- or tri-partite bargaining and social partnership, promoting decent work by decent workers for decent capitalists, states, patriarchs, militarists [fill this space]? And for concealing under its tripartite appearance the reality that 1) capital and state have 75 percent of the power in the ILO and 2) that it is not labour that has the other 25 percent but unions (state approved), themselves representing at best 10-15% of the world’s workers?
Just asking…
